Go to content
Skip menu
Skip menu
OCIMF SIRE 2.0 Technical Guide

SIRE 2.0 Human Factors in Tanker Inspections

Human factors play a critical role in SIRE 2.0 tanker inspections, with particular attention to crew behaviour, decision-making, communication, situational awareness, leadership, teamwork and the practical implementation of procedures during real vessel operations.

Human Factors in OCIMF SIRE 2.0 Inspections

SIRE 2.0 represents a major shift in tanker inspection philosophy, moving beyond documentation and equipment checks to focus strongly on human performance, behaviour and decision-making during real onboard operations.

This reflects the importance of human actions, communication, operational discipline and organizational culture in maintaining safe tanker operations.

Key SIRE 2.0 principle: Inspectors evaluate not only whether procedures exist, but also how effectively crews understand, apply and demonstrate those procedures during actual shipboard operations.

What Are Human Factors in SIRE 2.0?

Human factors refer to the behavioural and cognitive elements that influence shipboard operations. During SIRE 2.0 inspections, the practical interaction between people, procedures and equipment can be observed across different operational situations.

01

Decision-Making

The ability of officers and crew to make appropriate decisions when managing normal and high-risk operational situations.

02

Communication

Clear and effective communication between bridge, deck, engine and cargo-control personnel during vessel operations.

03

Situational Awareness

Awareness of vessel condition, cargo status, environmental conditions, equipment status and developing operational risks.

04

Leadership & Supervision

Effective leadership, instruction, supervision and intervention when unsafe conditions or deviations are identified.

05

Fatigue & Workload

Management of work and rest, crew alertness and watchkeeping effectiveness to support safe operational performance.

06

Team Coordination

Effective cooperation between departments and personnel during routine and critical vessel operations.

Why Human Factors Matter in SIRE 2.0

Tankers operate in high-risk environments involving hazardous cargo, strict environmental requirements and complex operational procedures. Under these conditions, human performance directly influences the effectiveness of risk controls.

SIRE 2.0 evaluates whether crews consistently demonstrate safe decision-making, effective communication and proper procedural application during real operational conditions.

Operational Risk

Human performance can influence the identification, assessment and control of operational risks during tanker activities.

Procedural Discipline

Procedures must be understood and applied effectively rather than simply maintained as documented requirements.

Team Performance

Effective coordination between personnel is essential during cargo operations, navigation, maintenance and emergency situations.

Safety Culture

Daily behaviour, communication and willingness to address unsafe conditions provide practical indicators of onboard safety culture.

Communication on Board

Communication is one of the most visible human factors during tanker inspections. Inspectors may observe communication between personnel during cargo, bridge, engine-room and other operational activities.

Bridge, Deck & Engine Communication

  • Clarity between bridge, deck and engine teams.
  • Effective coordination between departments.
  • Clear exchange of operational information.
  • Appropriate escalation of safety concerns.

Standard Maritime Communication

  • Use of clear and appropriate maritime terminology.
  • Confirmation of instructions.
  • Clear communication during critical operations.
  • Effective response to instructions under pressure.
Human factor observation: Weak communication can contribute to misunderstandings, inconsistent execution of procedures and increased operational risk.

Decision-Making During Tanker Operations

SIRE 2.0 observations may consider how decisions are made during real-time operational conditions, particularly when personnel are managing higher-risk activities.

01

Risk Evaluation

Personnel should consider operational risks before taking action and demonstrate awareness of the consequences of decisions.

02

Procedural Decision-Making

Decisions should remain consistent with applicable procedures even when operations are conducted under time or operational pressure.

03

Escalation

Appropriate operational issues should be communicated and escalated to the responsible level of authority.

04

Master–Officer Interaction

Effective interaction between the Master and officers supports structured decision-making and shared operational awareness.

Common weakness: Isolated decision-making without adequate team consultation can reduce the effectiveness of operational risk controls.

Situational Awareness

Situational awareness reflects the crew's ability to understand current operational conditions, recognize developing risks and anticipate potential consequences.

Cargo & Machinery Status

Personnel should maintain awareness of cargo condition, machinery status, alarms and relevant system indications.

Environmental Conditions

Operational decisions should consider relevant weather, sea-state and environmental conditions affecting vessel activities.

Abnormal Situations

Crew members should recognize abnormal conditions and take appropriate action rather than focusing only on the immediate task.

System Interdependencies

Personnel should understand how actions affecting one system may influence other vessel systems or operations.

Operational awareness: A frequent weakness is task-focused execution without sufficient awareness of the wider operational environment and associated risks.

Leadership and Supervision

Leadership behaviour is an important indicator of onboard safety culture. Effective leadership provides clear direction while ensuring that procedures and safe working practices are consistently applied.

Clear Instructions

Personnel receive clear instructions and understand their responsibilities before and during operational activities.

Safe Practice Enforcement

Supervisors actively address unsafe practices and ensure that agreed controls are maintained.

Task Monitoring

Operational activities are monitored to verify that work is being conducted according to the agreed method.

Response to Deviations

Deviations from procedures or expected conditions are recognized, communicated and addressed appropriately.

Leadership indicator: Strong leadership is reflected through structured, consistent and calm operational control, particularly during higher-risk activities.

Teamwork and Departmental Coordination

Effective tanker operations depend on coordination between bridge, deck and engine departments. SIRE 2.0 human factor observations may identify weaknesses where departments operate without sufficient shared operational understanding.

01

Cargo Operations

Bridge, deck and cargo-control personnel maintain aligned understanding during cargo preparation, transfer and completion activities.

02

Task Distribution

Responsibilities are clearly distributed and personnel understand their individual roles within the operation.

03

Effective Handovers

Operational information is transferred clearly during watch changes and task handovers.

04

Shared Understanding

Personnel maintain a common understanding of operational status, risks and required controls.

Fatigue Management

Fatigue can significantly affect human performance, alertness and decision-making in operational environments. Effective fatigue management therefore supports safe watchkeeping and operational performance.

Work & Rest Compliance

Work and rest arrangements should support applicable requirements and maintain adequate crew alertness.

Crew Alertness

Personnel performing safety-critical duties should demonstrate appropriate alertness and readiness.

Watchkeeping

Effective watchkeeping arrangements help maintain operational awareness during navigation, cargo and machinery operations.

Fatigue Mitigation

Practical measures should be used to identify and manage fatigue-related risks affecting operational performance.

Procedural Compliance in Practice

One of the important aspects of SIRE 2.0 is the difference between procedures existing in the Safety Management System and those procedures being effectively followed during actual operations.

Checklist Usage

Checklists should be actively used during relevant operations rather than treated solely as documentary requirements.

Permit-to-Work

Permit requirements should be understood, verified and implemented before controlled work begins.

Risk Assessment

Risk assessments should be relevant to the actual task and effectively implemented by personnel conducting the work.

Cargo Procedures

Cargo procedures should be understood and consistently applied throughout the operation.

Key observation: A common gap exists between documented procedures and actual onboard practice. SIRE 2.0 places significant emphasis on how procedures are demonstrated during operations.

Safety Culture and Behaviour

Safety culture is reflected through the daily attitudes and behaviours of personnel toward risk, operational discipline and unsafe conditions.

Stop Unsafe Work

Personnel should demonstrate willingness to stop or challenge unsafe activities when appropriate.

Near-Miss Reporting

Effective reporting of near misses supports identification of recurring risks and continuous improvement.

Open Risk Communication

Crew members should be able to communicate operational concerns openly and constructively.

Safety Participation

Active participation in safety discussions and operational controls supports stronger safety culture.

Human Factors Assessment Areas

Human Factor Typical SIRE 2.0 Observation Focus
Communication Clarity of communication, coordination between departments, instruction confirmation and communication during critical operations.
Decision-Making Risk evaluation, procedural discipline, escalation and interaction between responsible officers.
Situational Awareness Awareness of vessel condition, cargo status, environmental conditions and developing risks.
Leadership Quality of supervision, instruction, intervention and response to operational deviations.
Teamwork Coordination between bridge, deck and engine departments and effectiveness of operational handovers.
Fatigue Work/rest management, crew alertness and watchkeeping effectiveness.
Procedural Discipline Practical implementation of checklists, permits, risk assessments and operational procedures.
Safety Culture Behaviour toward risk, reporting, intervention and willingness to address unsafe work.

Key Insight – People, Process and Plant

Human factors in SIRE 2.0 are assessed through observation of real operations. The vessel is effectively considered as a complete system in which people, processes and equipment must work together.

01

People

Communication, behaviour, competence, leadership, teamwork and decision-making influence operational performance.

02

Process

SMS implementation, risk management, procedures, checklists and operational controls must be effectively applied.

03

Plant

Equipment condition, machinery reliability and system availability must support safe operational performance.

04

Alignment

Strong performance depends on people, processes and equipment operating together within an effective safety culture.

Key principle: Human factor performance cannot be considered separately from vessel procedures and equipment condition. Strong SIRE 2.0 performance requires alignment between people, process and plant.

How Operators Can Improve Human Factor Performance

01

Daily Operational Discipline

Maintain consistent application of operational procedures, checklists and risk controls during routine vessel activities.

02

Effective Communication

Strengthen communication between bridge, deck, engine and cargo teams through clear instructions, confirmation and effective handovers.

03

Practical SMS Implementation

Ensure that Safety Management System procedures are understood and demonstrated in actual onboard operations.

04

Regular Internal Inspections

Conduct practical internal inspections and observations that assess real operational behaviour rather than documentation alone.

05

Continuous Crew Training

Develop crew competence through relevant training, drills, operational discussions and practical familiarisation.

Technical Assessment Perspective

Real Operational Behaviour

SIRE 2.0 human factor performance is demonstrated through actual behaviour during vessel operations rather than solely through written procedures.

Practical Risk Control

Effective risk control depends on whether personnel understand and apply the required controls in the circumstances they face.

Leadership & Teamwork

Structured leadership and effective teamwork help maintain operational awareness and consistent execution of procedures.

Continuous Improvement

Internal observations, training, feedback and corrective action support continuous improvement in human factor performance.

Technical Reference Framework

Human factor readiness should be considered together with the vessel's applicable safety management system, tanker operational procedures, company requirements and recognized industry inspection expectations.

OCIMF SIRE 2.0 Tanker inspection framework emphasizing practical operational performance, vessel condition, procedures and human factors.
ISM Code Safety management requirements covering responsibilities, procedures, risk control and effective implementation onboard.
TMSA Tanker management practices supporting safety culture, operational discipline, leadership and continuous improvement.
SOLAS Applicable safety requirements relevant to navigation, emergency preparedness, equipment and vessel operations.
MARPOL Applicable pollution-prevention requirements supporting safe tanker operations and environmental protection.
Company SMS Vessel-specific procedures, risk controls, responsibilities and operational requirements implemented onboard.
Risk Management Practical identification, assessment and control of risks associated with vessel operations.
Human Performance Communication, leadership, teamwork, situational awareness and decision-making supporting safe operational performance.
Framework principle: SIRE 2.0 readiness should be approached as an integrated assessment of people, procedures and equipment, with emphasis on how effectively safety controls are implemented during actual vessel operations.

Independent SIRE 2.0 Technical Support

Independent Consultancy

PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services is an independent Philippine technical consultancy providing marine surveying, engineering assessment and maritime regulatory compliance support.

SIRE 2.0 Readiness

Technical consultancy can support vessel operators in identifying practical gaps in procedures, operational implementation, documentation and inspection readiness.

Human Factor Focus

Readiness assessments can consider communication, teamwork, procedural discipline, leadership, situational awareness and operational behaviour.

Objective Reporting

Findings are documented independently to assist vessel management teams in prioritizing corrective actions and improving practical inspection readiness.

About the Technical Author

Gregory Apostologlou

Managing Director of PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services. Mechanical Engineer and Marine Technical Superintendent with international maritime experience in marine surveying, vessel inspections, FPSO/SPM technical engineering, marine risk assessment and maritime regulatory compliance.

Gregory Apostologlou is also an authorized PHRS Surveyor.

Technical Content Review

Last Technical Review

July 2026

Review Frequency

Content is reviewed periodically to reflect applicable international maritime regulations, OCIMF inspection developments, recognized industry guidance and technical best practices.

Referenced technical framework: OCIMF SIRE 2.0, TMSA, ISM Code, SOLAS, MARPOL, applicable company Safety Management Systems and recognized tanker operational practices, where relevant to the subject.

SIRE 2.0 Human Factors FAQ

What are human factors in SIRE 2.0 inspections?

Human factors refer to crew behaviour, decision-making, communication, situational awareness and leadership that influence safe and effective vessel operations during SIRE 2.0 inspections.

Why are human factors important in SIRE 2.0?

Human factors are important because operational risk is strongly influenced by how procedures are understood, followed and implemented by personnel during real vessel operations.

What areas are assessed under human factors?

Human factor performance may involve teamwork, communication, fatigue management, situational awareness, decision-making, leadership, supervision and procedural discipline within the shipboard environment.

How can crews improve human factor performance?

Improvement can be supported through regular training, clear communication practices, effective bridge and engine resource management, practical drills, operational discussions and a strong safety culture onboard.

Does communication affect SIRE 2.0 inspection outcomes?

Yes. Clear communication between bridge, deck, engine and cargo personnel supports effective coordination, situational awareness and consistent implementation of operational procedures.

Does leadership influence SIRE 2.0 performance?

Yes. Effective leadership and supervision help ensure that procedures are followed, risks are controlled and deviations are identified and addressed appropriately.

How does fatigue affect human factor performance?

Fatigue can affect alertness, communication, decision-making and operational performance. Effective work and rest management supports safe watchkeeping and vessel operations.

Is having procedures enough for SIRE 2.0 readiness?

No. Procedures must be effectively understood and implemented during actual onboard operations. SIRE 2.0 places emphasis on practical operational performance rather than documentation alone.

Technical Reference Notice

This article provides general technical information concerning human factors and operational performance within the context of OCIMF SIRE 2.0 tanker inspections. Actual inspection observations depend on the vessel type, trading profile, condition, crew performance, operational circumstances, applicable company procedures and the specific inspection scope. This article does not replace the applicable OCIMF inspection framework, company Safety Management System, Flag State requirements, Classification Society requirements or other applicable regulatory and industry requirements.

Improve Your SIRE 2.0 Human Factor Readiness

Request an independent SIRE 2.0 readiness assessment, technical consultancy or human factor review. Provide the vessel type, location, intended inspection requirements and areas of concern so the PAMS technical team can review the appropriate scope.

Request Technical Consultation View All Article
☰ BLOG ARTICLES
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services
Marine Surveyors & Maritime Consultants
Address: 1214 P.Ocampo St., Malate, Manila, 1017 Metro Manila, Philippines
Phone: +63 969 524 0506
Email: [email protected]
Website: pamsmaritime.com
ShipServ TradeNet ID: 319922
DTI Registered Business No: 4088965
Established: 2018
Back to content