Stricter Oversight on Thickness Measurement Firms
The quality and reliability of hull thickness measurements are an important part of the structural survey process for applicable bulk carriers and oil tankers subject to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (2011 ESP Code).
From 1 January 2026, amendments adopted by the International Maritime Organization through MSC.553(108) strengthen the procedures for the approval and certification of firms engaged in thickness measurement of hull structures.
The amendments specifically provide for the Administration to audit the thickness measurement firm after satisfactory review of the firm's submitted documentation, in order to ascertain that the firm is properly organized and managed in accordance with the submitted documents and is capable of conducting thickness measurements of ship hull structures.
This strengthens the overall oversight framework surrounding thickness measurement services and supports greater confidence in the structural information used during applicable enhanced surveys.
MSC.553(108) and the 2011 ESP Code
MSC.553(108) is an IMO resolution adopted by the Maritime Safety Committee on 23 May 2024. It contains amendments to the 2011 ESP Code concerning the procedures for approval and certification of firms engaged in thickness measurement of hull structures.
The amendments entered into force on 1 January 2026. They address the Administration's role in auditing firms that carry out thickness measurements under the applicable enhanced survey framework.
The purpose is not to create a new independent class-surveyor audit authority. Rather, the amendment strengthens the Administration's ability to verify that an approved or certified thickness measurement firm is appropriately organized, managed and capable of performing the required work.
2011 ESP Code
The 2011 ESP Code establishes the enhanced programme of inspections during surveys of applicable bulk carriers and oil tankers, including requirements relating to structural examination and thickness measurement.
MSC.553(108)
MSC.553(108) amends the procedures for approval and certification of firms engaged in thickness measurement of hull structures and strengthens the Administration's audit role.
What Changed for Thickness Measurement Firms?
The amended procedures place clear emphasis on the ability of the thickness measurement firm to demonstrate that it is properly organized, appropriately managed and capable of conducting thickness measurements of hull structures.
Following satisfactory review of the documentation submitted by the firm, the Administration shall audit the firm to verify that its actual organization and management are consistent with the submitted documentation and that the firm is capable of performing hull structural thickness measurements.
Key Areas of Oversight
- Organization and management: the firm should be properly organized and managed in accordance with the documentation submitted for approval or certification.
- Technical capability: the firm should be capable of conducting thickness measurements of ship hull structures within the applicable scope.
- Personnel competence: personnel carrying out measurements should possess the appropriate knowledge, training, experience and qualifications required by the applicable approval or certification framework.
- Measurement procedures: the firm should operate according to documented procedures appropriate for the thickness measurement work undertaken.
- Equipment: measurement equipment should be suitable for the intended work and maintained in appropriate condition.
- Calibration and verification: appropriate arrangements should be maintained to support the reliability and accuracy of measurement equipment.
- Quality control: measurement activities and results should be subject to appropriate controls consistent with the firm's approved or certified arrangements.
- Measurement records and reporting: results should be properly recorded, identified and reported so that they can be used as part of the applicable structural survey process.
Which Ships Are Most Affected?
The 2011 ESP Code applies to the enhanced survey of applicable bulk carriers and oil tankers. The exact structural survey and thickness measurement requirements depend on the vessel type, construction characteristics, applicable statutory requirements and the survey being carried out.
Oil Tankers
Structural thickness measurements support assessment of applicable cargo tank structures, ballast spaces and other structural areas where corrosion and deterioration may affect the vessel's structural condition.
Bulk Carriers
Thickness measurements provide important information concerning the condition of cargo hold structures, transverse structures, ballast spaces and other applicable structural members subject to corrosion and wastage.
Enhanced Survey Ships
Ships covered by the applicable ESP requirements may require planned thickness measurements as part of their structural survey programme.
Intermediate and Special Surveys
The scope and extent of thickness measurements depend on the applicable ESP requirements, survey stage, vessel characteristics, previous findings and structural condition.
Why Accurate Thickness Measurement Matters
Hull thickness measurements provide objective information about the remaining thickness of structural steel and help identify areas affected by corrosion, wastage, pitting, local deterioration and structural diminution.
Reliable measurement information can be used by the attending surveyor and other responsible technical parties when assessing the vessel's structural condition against the applicable requirements.
Measurement Results May Identify
- General corrosion and wastage
- Localized corrosion
- Pitting and local deterioration
- Structural diminution
- Areas approaching applicable renewal thickness
- Areas requiring further close-up examination
- Locations requiring repairs or additional technical assessment
Incomplete, inconsistent or questionable measurement data may result in additional measurements, further examination or clarification before the applicable survey can be completed.
Approval and Certification of Thickness Measurement Firms
The 2011 ESP Code contains procedures concerning the approval and certification of firms engaged in thickness measurement of hull structures.
These procedures require the firm to provide documentation describing its organization, management and technical capability. The Administration reviews the submitted information and, where the document review is satisfactory, the firm is subject to an Administration audit.
The audit is intended to ascertain that the firm is duly organized and managed in accordance with the documents submitted and is capable of conducting thickness measurement of ship hull structures.
This provides an important verification step between the firm's submitted documentation and its actual ability to perform the required technical work.
Preparation Before a Hull Thickness Measurement Survey
Proper preparation helps ensure that the measurement work can be completed efficiently and that the resulting information is suitable for the intended structural survey.
Shipowners and Managers Should Consider
- Confirming the applicable survey and thickness measurement scope with the attending classification or authorized surveyor.
- Selecting a thickness measurement firm that is approved, certified or otherwise accepted as required by the applicable Administration and recognized organization arrangements.
- Preparing relevant structural drawings and previous thickness measurement reports.
- Reviewing previous measurement results and known areas of corrosion or structural deterioration.
- Providing safe access to the structural areas requiring examination.
- Ensuring tanks, holds and other spaces are suitably prepared for the planned examination.
- Coordinating the measurement programme with the attending surveyor.
- Ensuring that measurement personnel and equipment are properly prepared for the assigned work.
Thickness Measurement Planning
A thickness measurement plan should be developed in accordance with the applicable ESP requirements and the vessel's structural history.
The planning process should identify the structural areas requiring measurement and provide sufficient information to allow the resulting data to be properly evaluated within the applicable survey process.
Previous Records
Previous thickness measurement reports can provide information about corrosion trends and identify areas requiring particular attention during the current survey.
Structural Drawings
Relevant structural drawings and vessel documentation help identify and reference the structural locations selected for measurement.
Corrosion History
Known corrosion, previous repairs, coating deterioration and structural findings should be considered when preparing the measurement programme.
Survey Coordination
Early coordination between the owner, measurement firm, shipyard where applicable and attending surveyor can reduce delays and help ensure that required areas are available for examination.
Measurement Equipment and Data Quality
Ultrasonic thickness measurement equipment is commonly used for ship structural examinations. The reliability of the resulting information depends on the suitability of the equipment, its condition and verification, the competence of the operator, the surface condition and the measurement technique used.
Important Technical Considerations
- Suitability of the ultrasonic thickness measurement equipment for the intended work
- Appropriate calibration and verification arrangements
- Condition and accessibility of the measurement surface
- Correct probe selection and measurement technique
- Reliable identification of measurement locations
- Accurate recording of individual readings
- Appropriate quality checks of measurement information
- Clear and traceable reporting
Where measurement results appear inconsistent with the visible condition of the structure, additional readings or further examination may be required.
Role of the Administration and Surveyor
Under the amended 2011 ESP Code procedures, the Administration has a specific role in auditing the thickness measurement firm after satisfactory review of the firm's submitted documentation.
The purpose of the Administration audit is to verify that the firm is properly organized and managed in accordance with the submitted documentation and is capable of conducting thickness measurements of hull structures.
The attending surveyor has a separate role within the applicable statutory and classification survey process. Thickness measurement results form part of the technical information available to the surveyor when assessing the structural condition of the vessel.
The measurement firm and the surveyor therefore have distinct but complementary responsibilities. The measurement firm performs the measurement work and provides the associated data, while the attending surveyor evaluates the information within the applicable survey framework.
Common Problems That Can Delay a Survey
Incomplete Preparation
Inadequate access, poor space preparation or unavailable structural areas can prevent measurements from being completed as planned.
Incomplete Documentation
Missing previous reports, structural drawings or repair information can make it more difficult to establish and coordinate the required measurement scope.
Poor Measurement Quality
Inconsistent, incomplete or questionable readings may require repeat measurements or additional examination before the survey can be completed.
Late Coordination
Delayed coordination between the owner, measurement firm, shipyard where applicable and attending surveyor can create avoidable operational and scheduling problems.
Compliance Impact of MSC.553(108)
The significance of MSC.553(108) is the strengthening of Administration oversight of firms conducting hull structural thickness measurements under the applicable 2011 ESP Code framework.
The amendment helps close an important verification loop by allowing the Administration to audit the measurement firm and determine whether its actual organization, management and technical capability correspond with the information submitted for approval or certification.
Reliable thickness measurement information is important because structural survey decisions may depend on the data obtained from the hull structure. Effective oversight therefore supports confidence in the technical information used during applicable enhanced surveys.
The amendment should not be interpreted as creating a universal requirement that every thickness measurement firm is independently audited by every surveyor. The specific approval, certification and oversight arrangements remain subject to the applicable Administration and recognized organization framework.
Independent Technical Support for Hull Condition Assessment
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services provides independent marine surveying and marine technical consultancy services for shipowners, operators and maritime stakeholders.
Technical support may include vessel condition assessment, review of structural survey documentation, coordination of technical inspections, evaluation of thickness measurement information and assistance with preparation for applicable statutory and classification surveys.
PAMS does not replace the responsibilities of the flag Administration, classification society or authorized surveyor. Its role is to provide independent technical consultancy and survey support within the agreed scope.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MSC.553(108)?
MSC.553(108) is an IMO resolution adopted on 23 May 2024 containing amendments to the 2011 International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers (2011 ESP Code). The amendments concern the procedures for approval and certification of firms engaged in thickness measurement of hull structures.
When did MSC.553(108) enter into force?
The amendments adopted through MSC.553(108) entered into force on 1 January 2026.
Does MSC.553(108) amend SOLAS?
No. MSC.553(108) is an amendment to the 2011 ESP Code. It should not be described as a SOLAS amendment.
What changed for thickness measurement firms?
The amended procedures strengthen the Administration's role in auditing firms engaged in hull structural thickness measurement. Following satisfactory review of the firm's submitted documentation, the firm is audited by the Administration to ascertain that it is properly organized and managed in accordance with the submitted documents and capable of conducting thickness measurements of ship hull structures.
Who audits the thickness measurement firm?
Under the amended 2011 ESP Code provision, the Administration audits the firm after satisfactory review of the submitted documentation. The specific approval and certification arrangements depend on the applicable Administration and recognized organization framework.
Does MSC.553(108) give surveyors a new independent audit right?
The amendment specifically addresses the Administration's audit of the thickness measurement firm. It should not be interpreted as creating a universal independent audit authority for individual surveyors.
Which vessels are covered by the 2011 ESP Code?
The 2011 ESP Code provides the enhanced programme of inspections during surveys of applicable bulk carriers and oil tankers. The exact requirements depend on the vessel and the applicable statutory and classification framework.
Why are hull thickness measurements important?
Thickness measurements provide information about the remaining thickness of hull structural members and help identify corrosion, wastage, pitting, structural diminution and areas requiring further examination or repair.
What should a thickness measurement firm demonstrate?
Within the applicable approval and certification framework, the firm should be able to demonstrate suitable organization, management, personnel competence, procedures, equipment and technical capability for conducting hull structural thickness measurements.
Can poor thickness measurement results affect a vessel survey?
Yes. Incomplete, inconsistent or questionable measurement information may lead to additional measurements, further examination or clarification before the applicable survey assessment can be completed.
What should shipowners prepare before thickness measurements?
Owners should coordinate the measurement scope with the attending surveyor, arrange suitable access and space preparation, provide relevant structural documentation and previous thickness measurement reports, and ensure that the measurement firm meets the applicable approval, certification or acceptance requirements.
Does the measurement company replace the surveyor?
No. The measurement firm performs the thickness measurement work and provides the associated data. The attending surveyor evaluates that information within the applicable statutory and classification survey process.
Can PAMS assist with hull condition and thickness measurement surveys?
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services provides independent marine surveying and technical consultancy support, including vessel condition assessment, technical inspection coordination and review of structural survey information within the agreed scope.
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services is an independent marine technical consultancy based in Manila, Philippines, specializing in marine surveying, marine technical consultancy, offshore engineering consultancy, FPSO engineering support, marine audits, technical inspections and maritime regulatory compliance.
PAMS supports shipowners, operators and maritime stakeholders with independent technical assessments, vessel condition surveys, structural inspection support and preparation for applicable statutory and classification requirements.
Manila, Philippines — Independent Marine Technical Consultancy
Need Technical Support for a Hull Condition Survey?
Contact PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services for independent marine surveying, vessel condition assessment and marine technical consultancy.